October 24, 2007
Can Financial Marketers Really Learn From Nike?
At first glace, the article on page one of today’s The Wall Street Journal entitled “Nike Hires Influencers” seems to hold little for financial marketers. But there are three important object lessons that translate to investment product development. First is the notion of building products for the end user. I don’t think we spend enough time researching and understanding investor needs. Instead, we defer that responsibility to the financial intermediary. Investment management marketing needs to return to a time when the “manufacturer” knew the investor better. Second, with differentiation rated the number one business problem in our most recent study with FRC, I think the idea of injecting more creativity and consumer focus into our product offerings has merit. Whether American Century’s LiveStrong Portfolios ever turn out to be a critical sales success, they do represent a fresh twist on a commodity product. Finally, the idea of identifying “influencers” really resonated with me. When we are segmenting and researching the needs of financial intermediaries, maybe gaining a better understanding of the role that these FAs play in their offices can provide some fresh insights to direct new marketing and product initiatives.
What do you think?
What you are describing above is really channel marketing 101. Any marketer who distributes his product through one or more 3rd parties before it reaches its final customer/user needs to consider all of those so-called “steps” in the distribution channel as customers. That’s what makes it so challenging because you need to balance the needs of your channel against the needs of your ultimate consuming audience.